|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Wednesday 3/26/14 - 6:25:39 PM EST (GMT-5)
For information specific to movies, imdb wins. I use wikipedia more though, because I'm not just looking up info about movies, I like to look things up about other things too.
|
|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Wednesday 3/26/14 - 7:00:55 PM EST (GMT-5)
Wikipedia. IMDB's "facts" are often unreliable.
|
|
Adele21
Female,
13-17
Western US
Joined: 8 yrs, 3 mos ago
123 Posts
|
|
|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Wednesday 3/26/14 - 7:14:57 PM EST (GMT-5)
Wikipedia. Relible and detailed.
|
|
chloebean
Female,
13-17
Eastern US
Joined: 8 yrs, 3 mos ago
2 Posts
|
|
|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Wednesday 3/26/14 - 9:39:40 PM EST (GMT-5)
Wikipedia is not reliable because you can type other stuff in.
|
|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Thursday 3/27/14 - 1:33:09 AM EST (GMT-5)
On Wednesday 3/26/14 - 7:00:55 PM Electric wrote: Wikipedia. IMDB's "facts" are often unreliable. |
Wikipedia often copies imdb's trivia facts.
It's easy to say bullsh-t in both.
|
|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Thursday 3/27/14 - 6:52:26 AM EST (GMT-5)
They're both reliable, for internet information. That isn't saying much.
|
|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Thursday 3/27/14 - 1:35:33 PM EST (GMT-5)
I'm going to start publishing crap on Wikipedia just to mess with Electric...
|
|
8 yrs ago, 2 mos ago - Sunday 3/30/14 - 6:10:53 AM EST (GMT-5)
wikipedia, more info on there than just films and actors and TV shows.
|
|
Iluvkoth2
Female,
30-39
Southern US
Joined: 3 months ago
53 Posts
|
|
|
3 months ago - Sunday 3/6/22 - 4:10:59 PM EST (GMT-5)
Wikipedia is edited too easily. IMDb is more reliable.
|