Question Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Answer Questions | Question Comments | My Questions | Favorites | +Add Question
LATEST
POPULAR PRIORITY RANDOM

All | Games | Funny | Entertainment | Quizzes | Weird | Tech | People | Arts/Lit | News | Science | Sports | Places | Misc

2,005 hits Rate me! Share Favorite | Flag 16 years ago by Aburame

Are theocratic governments always doomed to failure?


Put This Question on Your Page (MySpace, Livejournal, Blog, etc)
[Preview] EMBED CODE:


Prev 1 2 Next (showing 1-25 of 39)

Bottom Last Post

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 11:46:31 AM EST (GMT-5)
By theocratic governments, I'm assuming you mean religious? If so, then yes.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 11:47:46 AM EST (GMT-5)
You don't have to *assume* what *I* mean, that's what the freakin' word means.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:06:57 PM EST (GMT-5)
Woah, chill out dude. Geez.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:16:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
No. I don't think they are...it would depend upon the religion in question, while I'd love to live in a country based on Christianity, I wouldn't like to live in one based on Islam.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:19:57 PM EST (GMT-5)
On 5/22/2006 12:16:05 PM oldfashioned wrote:
No. I don't think they are...it would depend upon the religion in question, while I'd love to live in a country based on Christianity, I wouldn't like to live in one based on Islam.

Very true. That's the problem. There would be too much diversity. It would lead to something like ethnic cleansing and we'd all be unhappy. It'd be like another holocaust.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:20:42 PM EST (GMT-5)
A country based on Christianity? Hmmm, that sounds familiar...


16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:24:11 PM EST (GMT-5)
Nah, true christianity teaches loving your neighbor as yourself, doing good to those that use and abuse you, turning the other cheek...doing unto others as you would have them do to you, not thinking of yourselves more highly than you ought to, serving others. To my way of thinking, the salem witch trials, the inquisitions and others werent examples of true christianity and will someday be judged as such.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:26:08 PM EST (GMT-5)
So you're the last and final judge of what "true Christianity" is? All those things were a *direct* result of Christian dogma and people believing in their Christian duty.

I agree that certain Christian principles are very relevant in society, but forgiveness and love of humanity are hardly Christian-only concepts. Fact is, experiments between religion and government have always failed, always ethically and eventually politically as well.

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:28:12 PM EST (GMT-5)
I am not the final judge, I believe God Himself is the judge. You never saw Jesus burning a witch at the stake, or boiling an unbeliever in oil. In fact Jesus forgave a woman caught in sin and even forgave those the nailed Him to a cross.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:29:41 PM EST (GMT-5)
And yet people with the absolute faith in Christian principles have done all those things and more. The fact is it doesnt' really matter *what* the true principles of any religion are, once you have faith in something that is unproven lunacy at worst, you can justify *anything*.


Like the justification that killing unbelievers is the right thing to do because they contaminate other, good Christians, thus it is moral to kill people.

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:36:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
I have faith in God and I consider the bible to be the Written Word of God. But I would never lift my hand to do another harm, simply becasue he or she disagreed with me. Those that do are deceived and ignore the teachings of Christ, whom they claim to follow....but in hindsight, I would say that you are correct that such a form of government would not work in our modern society, too many people think they are justified to shoot abortion docs and burn witches. But, I believe that someday, such a system will be possible and will happen.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:39:10 PM EST (GMT-5)
How can you hold such a belief though? Governmental progress has usually moved the *other* way, away from theocracy and into progressive, secular government.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:39:25 PM EST (GMT-5)
No, lots of theocratic governments have done just fine for themselves for centuries, haven't they?
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:45:05 PM EST (GMT-5)
My belief is based on the bible. I believe that the bible teaches a thousand year period where the earth will be renewed and ruled by God Himself. That probably labels me as a fanatic, I can accept that. When you consider the faith of our founding fathers and the USA having been based on christian principles, and where we are today, where you can't post the ten commandments in a courthouse or school room, I wouldn't call that any form of progress. In fact I worry that in ten or twenty years, that the USA will be as intolerant to christianity as the old USSR once was.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:45:07 PM EST (GMT-5)
On 5/22/2006 12:39:26 PM KikiPeepers wrote:
No, lots of theocratic governments have done just fine for themselves for centuries, haven't they?

Most governments I have read have a power sharing basis between the church and the state. Rather than simply the church.

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:48:02 PM EST (GMT-5)
Like I said, just because Christian principles are humanitarian does not mean that humanitarianism is a Christian concept. The fact that we keep religion out of government, to me, is a sign of progress. Theocracy is not the right answer. You say the USSR was intolerant of Christianity, but what about all those Christian states who were intolerant of everyone else?


The next 10-20 years? Absolutely not, we have freedom of religion in this country, we are built upon it. Just because we intolerate Christian intrusion doens't mean we are persecuting you.

Also, you don't have to preface all your comments with "I believe in the Bible".

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:53:07 PM EST (GMT-5)
Just want to be clear where I am coming from. I believe in freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. I don't believe that a polititian has to divorce him/herself from their religion just becasue they happen to hold public office. And if our government is of the people, by the people, don't christians, with all their beliefs have as much right to participate in the democratic process as anyone else? And it goes deeper, preventing christian intrusion, becomes the intrusion of the state into churches, censoring what pastors can and cannot preach from their pulpits as an example.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 12:56:19 PM EST (GMT-5)
The problem with politicians and their belief system is that religion is absolute insanity. A politician needs to have sound reason and facts to back up his position, instead he can simply use his religion to justify insane things like cutting funding for sex educatin or stem cells, all the while claiming "faith", but not fact.

Christians are allowed to participate in government, no one is disputing that, but freedom of religion also means we can't impose religion or religious ideals on other people, we are not all Christians nor are all Christians in agreement.

Also, states do not limit or censor preachers, oldfashioned, unless those churches are recieving government money. I also believe this is wrong, this is why we should tax churches, so they dont' have to meet government standards and have freedom to practice whatever they want.

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 1:04:04 PM EST (GMT-5)
That's what hate laws do, if a preacher preaches certain issues then that minister can be prosecuted for hate speach. Religion being insanity is a matter of perspective. Passing out condoms to teenagers instead of teaching abstinance and using stem cells from aborted babies is insanity as far as some of us are concerned. But in the interests of peace, I agree to concede the final word to you. Merely expressing my opinion on the subject as I see it...anyway, christians seem to be a minority in this country, so I doubt you will ever have to worry about the USA becoming a theocratic nation. It was nice talking with you.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 3:21:53 PM EST (GMT-5)
Christians are not the minority, over 80% of this country identifies themselves as christian, according to the census bearue. And hate laws do not apply to churches, oldfashioned, preaches have never been arrested for giving sermons condmening homosexuals to jail, unless you have some proof of this happening.


It is isanity to believe something for absolutely no reason, this is how we define pyschopaths, if they believe voices in their heads or think some invisible monster is stalking them, they are crazy unless it is part of a religious practice. Handing out condomsn stops STDs, Abstinence Only increases them, therefore it is insane to fund a program that doesn't work.

Also, stem cell research can save millions, yet people have "faith" that cells have souls? give me a freakin' break.

16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 3:39:21 PM EST (GMT-5)
All governments are doomed to failure, nothing lasts forever. Everything lives its time then dies.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 6:23:01 PM EST (GMT-5)
They are doomed to alienate a vast section of the population, which could lead to failure.
In response to a few things I've read here:
- when the President is making major decisions for our country based on Christianity, Christianity is being forced upon us regardless of how many people believe in it
- is it more insane to give high schoolers condoms that will protect them from pregnancy and diseases when they decide to have sex (which let's face it, is quite commonplace), or to push abstainance on them in hopes that they will do the "right thing", leaving them ignorant and defenseless if, god forbid, they don't
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Monday 5/22/06 - 7:02:46 PM EST (GMT-5)
yes.
religion always gets in the way, in my opinion.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Tuesday 5/23/06 - 1:42:14 PM EST (GMT-5)
On 5/22/2006 7:02:47 PM liARSENIC wrote:
yes. religion always gets in the way, in my opinion.

I agree. Its the only thing that pushes a lot of people to be the way that they are.
16 yrs ago, 1 mos ago - Tuesday 5/23/06 - 8:51:15 PM EST (GMT-5)
doom to failure? no. The population is doomed.

No religion should be part of government.


Prev 1 2 Next (showing 1-25 of 39)



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Top



10 Most Popular Questions Today
1 does anyone use this site anymore?

2 Should Scientologists be banned from advertising at county fairs?

3 Do you live in a home that has been owned by your family for multiple generations?

4 Would you allow your partner in the room with you during an a gynecological exam?

5 If a public school dress code does not allow Satanic clothing, should it also not allow all religious clothing?

6 Do you prefer croissants or bagels?

7 Have you gotten your COVID vaccine?

8 Would you accept a guaranteed $120,000/yr allowance on the condition you would never be allowed to earn money from any other source?

9 Should Christians do yoga?

10 Reese's Peanut Butter Cups or Twix : Which do you prefer ?

More Questions
 
Edit